The significance of exposure parameters in dental radiography

References

1. • Crandell C.E.
   An Evaluation of the Influence of the Half-Value Layer on the Diagnostic Quality of Intraoral Roentgenograms.
   Oral Surg., Oral Med. & Oral Path. 1966; 21: 39-46
   • Google Scholar
2. • Fitzgerald C.M.
   Dental Roentgenography. IV. The Voltage Factor (KV.P.).
   J. Am. Dent. A. 1950; 41: 19-28
   • Google Scholar
3. • Wuehrann A.H.
   • Monacelli C.J.
   Selection of Optimum Kilovoltage for Dental Radiography. I. Preliminary Studies.
   Radiology. 1951; 57: 240-247
   • Google Scholar
4. • Webber R.L.
   • Benton P.A.
   • Ryge G.
   Diagnostic Variations in Radiographs.
   Oral Surg., Oral Med. & Oral Path. 1968; 26: 800-809
   • Google Scholar
5. • Villanyi A.A.
   Film Sensitivity and Kilovoltage in Dental Radiography.
   J. South. California D. A. 1964; 32: 147-150
   • Google Scholar
6. • Jacobson B.
   • Stuart-Mackey R.
   Radiological Contrast Enhancing Methods.
   in: ed., 5. Advances in Biological and Medical Physics. vol. VI. Academic Press, Inc, New York1958: 201-261
   • Google Scholar
7. • Buchholz R.E.
   Radiographic Interpretation of Proximal Carious Lesions.
   D. Radiog. & Photog. 1965; 38: 9-12
   • Google Scholar
8. • Pentel L.
   • Goren A.D.
   Tone Scale and Separation in Dental X-ray Emulsions.
   Oral Surg., Oral Med. & Oral Path. 1966; 21: 748-760
   • Google Scholar
9. • Richards A.G.
   Technical Factors That Control Radiographic Densities.
   D. Clin. North America. 1961; : 371-377
   • Google Scholar
10. • Updegrave W.J.
    High or Low Kilovoltage.
    D. Radiog. & Photog. 1960; 33: 71-78
    • Google Scholar
11. • Ritchey B.
    • Feldman A.
    • Greer W.
    Roentgenography of Enamel: Apatite as a Phantom Material; Contrast as a Function of Exposure Factors.
    Oral Surg., Oral Med. & Oral Path. 1960; 13: 188-193
    • Google Scholar
12. • Buchholz R.E.
    No Kilovoltage Dilemma.
    Oral Surg., Oral Med. & Oral Path. 1967; 23: 459-461
    • Google Scholar
13. • Pentel L.
    A Response to “No Kilovoltage Dilemma”.
    Oral Surg., Oral Med. & Oral Path. 1967; 24: 364
    • Google Scholar
14. • Wainwright W.E.
    Filtration for Lowest Patient Dose in Dental Radiography.
    Oral Surg., Oral Med. & Oral Path. 1963; 16: 561-571
    • Google Scholar
15. • Wainwright W.W.
    How Much Radiation Does the Patient Receive Per Set of Dental Radiographs.
    J. California D. A. December 1963; 39
    • Google Scholar
16. • Villanyi A.A.
    The Fight Over One Millimeter of Aluminum.
    J. South. California D. A. 1963; 31: 32-34
    • Google Scholar
17. • Villanyi A.A.
    Dental X-ray Filters: Their Use and Misuse.
    J. South. California D. A. 1963; 31: 218-222
    • Google Scholar
18. • Villanyi A.A.
    The Fight Over 1 Millimeter of Aluminum Continues.
    J. South. California D. A. 1963; 31: 160-163
    • Google Scholar
19. • Wainwright W.W.
    Dental Radiation Dose: Sensitometric Method for Determination of Exposure-Development Factors.
    Oral Surg., Oral Med. & Oral Path. 1963; 16: 674-682
    • Google Scholar
20. • Villanyi A.A.
    About High KV Again.
    J. South. California D. A. 1963; 31: 114-116
    • Google Scholar
21. • Trout E.D.
    • Kelley J.P.
    • Lucas A.C.
    Determination of Half-Value Layer.
    Am. J. Roentgenol. 1960; 84: 729-740
    • Google Scholar

22. Webber, R. L., Benton, P. A., Cvar, J. F., and Ryge, G.: Diagnostic Significance of Intratissue Contrast in Bite Wing Radiographs. (In preparation.)

    • Google Scholar

23. Mellor, L., Webber, R. L., and Ryge, G.: Diagnostic Comparison of Polaroid Positive Prints With Conventional Bite Wing Radiographs. (Unpublished data, 1967.)

    • Google Scholar
24. • Goren A.D.
    • Pentel L.
    • Goldfarb S.K.
    Radiation Quality and X-ray Emulsion Responses.
    in: I.A.D.R. Annual Meeting, Radiology Section, Washington, D. C.March, 1967
    • Google Scholar
25. • Dudley R.A.
    Hine G.J. Brownell G.L. Radiation Dosimetry. Academic Press, Inc, New York1956 (chap. 7)
    • Google Scholar
26. National Bureau of Standards, Handbook 76. Feb. 9, 1961;
    • Google Scholar
27. • Spangenberg H.D.
    • Pool M.L.
    A 65 or 90 Kilovolt X-ray Machine.
    Oral Surg., Oral Med. & Oral Path. 1960; 13: 552-565
    • Google Scholar
28. • Henrikson C.O.
    Iodine 125 as a Radiation Source for Odontological Roentgenology.
    Acta radiol. 1967; : 1-89
    • Google Scholar
29. • Carlsson C.
    Determination of Integral Absorbed Dose From Exposure Measurement.
    Acta radiol. ther. phys. biol. 1963; 1: 433
    • Google Scholar
30. • Hettinger G.
    • Starfelt N.
    Bremsstrahlung Spectra From Roentgen Tubes.
    Acta radiol. 1958; 50: 381
    • Google Scholar
31. • Barr J.H.
    • Garcia D.A.
    X-ray Spectra From Dental X-ray Generators. Part I. Some General Characteristics.
    Oral Surg., Oral Med. & Oral Path. 1966; 22: 478-488
    • Google Scholar
32. • Garcia D.A.
    X-ray Spectra From Dental X-ray Generators. Part II. The Primary Beam.
    Oral Surg., Oral Med. & Oral Path. 1967; 23: 610-626
    • Google Scholar
33. • Richards A.G.
    Quality of an X-ray Beam.
    Oral Surg., Oral Med. & Oral Path. 1964; 17: 739-744
    • Google Scholar