Short communication & case report| Volume 48, ISSUE 1, P92-96, July 1979

Download started.


Cephalometric studies of patients with ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint following surgical treatment

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.


      Cephalometric studies of eighteen cases of ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint, treated surgically, were undertaken. Arthroplasty tended to correct the characteristic facial deviation of patients with ankylosis and approximate the facial features of these patients to those of a normal person. These changes were found to occur in a larger percentage of the patients and to a greater magnitude 6 months postoperatively than 1 week following surgery. These findings support the concept that the mandible grows in response to functional stimulation and emphasize the importance of early surgical treatment of ankylosis of the temporomandibular joint.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


        • El-Mofty S.
        Cephalometric Studies of Patients With Ankylosis of the Temporomandibular Joint.
        Oral Surg. 1977; 44: 153-162
        • El-Mofty S.
        Mandibular Features of Patients With Temporomandibular Ankylosis.
        Oral Surg. 1978; 46: 310-317
        • El-Mofty S.
        Surgical Treatment of Ankylosis of the Temporomandibular Joint.
        J. Oral Surg. 1974; 32: 202-206
        • El-Mofty S.
        Ankylosis of the Temporomandibular Joint.
        Oral Surg. 1972; 33: 650-660
        • Broadbent B.H.
        A New X-ray Technique and Its Application to Orthodontics.
        Angle Orthod. 1931; 1: 45-66
        • Salzmann J.A.
        Orthodontics in Daily Practice.
        in: J. B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia1974: 183-196
        • Thoma K.H.
        ed. 5. Oral Surgery. vol. 2. The C. V. Mosby Company, St. Louis1969: 671-686
        • Dingman R.O.
        Bilateral Ankylosis of Temporomandibular Joints With Retrusion Deformity; Report of Case.
        J. Oral Surg. 1944; 2: 71-76
        • Hinds E.C.
        • Pleasants J.E.
        Reconstruction of the Temporomandibular Joint.
        Am. J. Surg. 1955; 9: 931-939
        • Longacre J.J.
        • Gilby R.F.
        The Use of Autogenous Cartilage Graft in Arthroplasty for True Ankylosis of the Temporomandibular Joint.
        Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1951; 7: 271-287
        • Georgiade N.
        • Altary F.
        • Pickrell K.
        An Experimental and Clinical Evaluation of Autogenous Dermal Grafts Used in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Ankylosis.
        Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1957; 19: 321-336
        • Engel M.B.
        • Brodie A.G.
        Condylar Growth and Mandibular Deformities.
        Surgery. 1947; 22: 976-992
        • Moss M.L.
        • Rankow R.
        The Role of the Functional Matrix in Mandibular Growth.
        Angle Orthod. 1968; 38: 95-103
        • Van der Klaauw C.J.
        Cerebral Skull and Facial Skull: A Contribution to the Knowledge of Skull-Structure.
        Arch. Neerl. Zool. 1945; 7: 16-37
        • Scott J.H.
        Growth at the Facial Sutures.
        Am. J. Orthod. 1956; 42: 381-387
        • Scott J.H.
        The Cranial Base.
        Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1958; 16: 319-348
        • Moss M.L.
        • Young R.W.
        A Functional Approach to Craniology.
        Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1960; 18: 281-292
        • Moss M.L.
        The Functional Matrix.
        in: Kraus B.S. Riedel R.A. Vistas in Orthodontics. Lea & Febiger, Inc, Philadelphia1962: 85-98
        • Koski K.
        Cranial Growth Centers: Factors or Fallacies.
        Am. J. Orthod. 1968; 54: 566-583
        • Moss M.L.
        Functional Analysis of Human Mandibular Growth.
        J. Prosthet. Dent. 1960; 10: 1149-1159
        • Moss M.L.
        • Salentijn L.
        The Primary Role of Functional Matrices in Facial Growth.
        Am. J. Orthod. 1969; 55: 566-577
        • Moss M.L.
        • Simon M.
        Growth of the Human Mandibular Angular Process: A Functional Cranial Analysis.
        Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1968; 28: 127-138
        • Moss M.L.
        • Salentijn L.
        The Capsular Matrix.
        Am. J. Orthod. 1969; 56: 474-490
        • Moss M.L.
        • Salentijn L.
        The Compensatory Role of the Condylar Cartilage in Mandibular Growth: Theoretical and Clinical Implications.
        Dtsch. Zahn. Mund. Kieferheilkd. 1971; 56: 5-16
        • Kazanjian V.H.
        Bilateral Absence of the Ascending Rami of the Mandible.
        Br. J. Plast. Surg. 1956; 9: 77-82
        • Das A.
        • Meyer J.
        • Sicher H.
        X-ray and Alizarin Studies on the Effect of Bilateral Condylectomy in the Rat.
        Angle Orthod. 1965; 35: 138-148
        • Gianelly A.A.
        • Moorrees C.F.
        Condylectomy in the Rat.
        Arch. Oral Biol. 1965; 10: 101-106
        • Jarabak J.R.
        • Thompson J.R.
        Cephalometric Appraisal of the Cranium and Mandible of the Rat Following Condylar Resection.
        J. Dent. Res. 1949; 28: 655-656
        • Saranat B.G.
        Facial and Neurocranial Growth After Removal of the Mandibular Condyle in the Macaca Rhesus Monkey.
        Am. J. Surg. 1957; 94: 19-30
        • Krause B.S.
        • Wise W.J.
        • Frei R.H.
        Heredity and the Craniofacial Complex.
        Am. J. Orthod. 1959; 45: 172-217
        • Lundstrom A.
        The Importance of Genetic and Non-genetic Factors in the Facial Skeleton Studied in 100 Pairs of Twins.
        in: Eur. Orthod. Soc. Rep. Cong. 30. 1954: 92-107
        • Lundstrom A.
        The Significance of Genetic and Nongenetic Factors in the Profile of the Facial Skeleton.
        Am. J. Orthod. 1955; 41: 910-916
        • Watnick S.S.
        Inheritance of Craniofacial Morphology.
        Angle Orthod. 1972; 42: 339-351