Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 59, ISSUE 3, P302-305, March 1985

Computed tomography in the diagnosis of an odontogenic keratocyst

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      Computed tomography (CT) was found to be useful in the diagnosis of an odontogenic keratocyst. A CT scanner is described and its advantages, radiation dose levels, and limitations are discussed.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      References

        • McCullough EC
        • Coulam CM
        Physical and dosimetric aspects of diagnostic geometrical and computer-assisted tomographic procedures.
        Radiol Clin North Am. 1976; 14: 3-14
        • Hounsfield GN
        Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography): description of system.
        Br J Radiol. 1973; 46: 1016-1022
        • North A
        • Rice J
        Computed tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery.
        J Oral Surg. 1981; 39: 199-207
        • McCullough EC
        • Payne JT
        Patient dosage in computed tomography.
        Radiology. 1978; 129: 457-463
        • Rice J
        • Banks T
        Normal and high accuracy computed tomography of the brain: dose and image considerations.
        J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1979; 3: 497-502
        • Wall BF
        • et al.
        Doses to patient from pantomographic and conventional dental radiology.
        Br J Radiol. 1979; 52: 727-734
        • Schindler E
        • Reck R
        Value and limits of computer-assisted tomography.
        Head Neck Surg. 1980; 2: 287-292
        • Ames J
        • Johnson R
        • Stevens E
        Computerized tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery.
        J Oral Surg. 1980; 38: 145-149