Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 64, ISSUE 1, P123-129, July 1987

Download started.

Ok

Diagnostic imaging assessment of experimental intraoral “folded film”

  • John B. Ludlow
    Correspondence
    Reprint requests to: John B. Ludlow Department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology School of Dentistry University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1078
    Affiliations
    The University of Michigan School of Dentistry Ann Arbor, Mich., USA
    Search for articles by this author
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Abstract

      “Folded film” is an experimental technique of film preparation that provides diagnostic imaging of intraoral structures with one-half the radiation required to produce conventional images. In this study, folded film periapical images were compared with similar conventional D- and E-speed film images with the use of 12 criteria for diagnostic visualization. Nineteen examiners judged folded films to be slightly less diagnostic than D-speed film images and somewhat more diagnostic than E-speed films. All systems were judged adequate for diagnostic visualization of bone and teeth.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Reference

        • Colquitt WN
        • Richards AG
        An old/new idea for reducing exposure to x-rays.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1982; 54: 597-600
        • Silha RE
        The new Kodak Ektaspeed dental x-ray film.
        Dent Radiogr Photogr. 1981; 54: 32-35
        • Horton PS
        • et al.
        A clinical comparison of speed group D and E dental x-ray films.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984; 54: 104-108
        • Frykholm A
        Kodak Ektaspeed—a new dental x-ray film.
        Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1983; 12: 47-49
        • Thunthy KH
        • Weinberg R
        Sensitometric comparison of dental films of group D and E.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1982; 54: 250-252
        • Girsch WJ
        • Matteson SR
        • McKee MW
        An evaluation of Kodak Ektaspeed periapical film for use in endodontics.
        J Endod. 1983; 9: 282-288
        • Kaffee I
        • Littner MN
        • Kuspet ME
        Densitometric evaluation of intraoral x-ray films: Ektaspeed versus Ultraspeed.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984; 57: 338-342
        • Kaugars GE
        • Harmon JF
        • Kaugars CC
        A comparison of D- and E-speed intraoral film.
        Gen Dent. 1984; 32: 316-317
        • Reynolds RL
        A clinical evaluation of Kodak Ektaspeed dental x-ray film.
        J Okla Dent Assoc. 1982; 73: 13-14
        • Grondahl K
        • Grondahl HG
        • Olving A
        A comparison of Kodak Ektaspeed and Ultraspeed films for the detection of periodontal bone lesions.
        Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1983; 12: 43-46
        • Donnelly JC
        • Hartwell GR
        • Johnson WB
        Clinical evaluation of Ektaspeed x-ray film for use in endodontics.
        J Endod. 1985; 11: 90-94
        • Kleier DJ
        • Benner SJ
        • Averbach RE
        Two dental x-ray films compared for rater preference using endodontic views.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1985; 59: 201-205
        • White SC
        • Gratt BM
        • Hollender L
        Comparison of xeroradiographs and film for detection of calculus.
        Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1984; 13: 39-43
        • White SC
        • Hollender L
        • Gratt BM
        Comparison of xeroradiographs and film for detection of proximal surface caries.
        J Am Dent Assoc. 1984; 108: 755-759
        • White SC
        • Hollender L
        • Gratt BM
        Comparison of xeroradiographs and film for detection of periapical lesions.
        J Dent Res. 1984; 63: 910-913
        • Okano T
        • Huang H
        • Nakamur T
        Diagnostic accuracy on detection of proximal enamel lesions in nonscreen radiographic performance.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1985; 59: 543-547
        • Trout ED
        • Kelley JP
        • Lucas AC
        The second half-value layer and the homogenity coefficient.
        Am J Roentgenol. 1962; 87: 574-584
        • Wainwright WW
        Dental radiation dose: sensitometric method for determination of exposure-development factors.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1963; 16: 674-682