This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.
Abstract
Tissue healing was compared after apicectomy and filling of ferret lower canines with
glass ionomer (Ketacfil) or gutta-percha/sealer (Tubliseal). Both materials provoked
an inflammatory response after 7 days, but the response to glass ionomer was less
severe. The response after 28 days was different. Mild inflammation related to the
gutta-percha was still present, but no inflammation was found in relation to the glass
ionomer. Bone infill was quite advanced in all specimens at 28 days but was more complete
in the glass ionomer specimens, with intimate contact between the bone and cement.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral RadiologyAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- A practical root resection technique for young permanent anterior teeth.Dent Digest. 1941; 47: 60-64
- Apicectomy with retrograde gold foil—a new technique.NY State Dent J. 1973; 39: 8-11
- A study of a new material for retrograde fillings.J Endod. 1978; 4: 203-206
- Results of retrograde root filling with special reference to amalgam and Cavit as root-filling materials.Sven Tandlak Tidskr. 1974; 67: 123-313
- Comparative sealability study of different retrofilling materials.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1978; 45: 273-281
- Comparison of silver amalgam, glass ionomer cement, and gutta percha as retrofilling materials; an in vivo and an in vitro study.J Indian Dent Assoc. 1983; 55: 153-158
- The apical seal via the retrosurgical approach, 2. An evaluation of retrofilling materials.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1982; 54: 213-218
- A new translucent cement for dentistry—the glass ionomer cement.Br Dent J. 1972; 132: 133-135
- Pulpal response to a glass ionomer cement.Br Dent J. 1978; 144: 345-350
- Biological evaluation on glass ionomer cement.J Dent Res. 1979; 58: 1080-1086
- Characterization of glass-ionomer cements, 7. The physical properties of current materials.J Dent. 1984; 12: 231-240
- Adhesion of human blood monocytes and lymphocytes to different endodontic cements: a methodological in vitro study.J Endod. 1986; 12: 150-155
- Periapical response to apical plugs of dentine and calcium hydroxide in ferret canines.J Endod. 1984; 10: 71-74
- Apical healing with retrofilling materials amalgam and gutta percha.J Endod. 1975; 1: 63-65
- An experimental study on regeneration of cementum, periodontal ligament and alveolar bone in the intradentinal cavities of the root canal filled teeth in dogs [English abstract].J Tokyo Dent Coll Soc. 1977; 77: 487-498
- Osseous healing kinetics after apicoectomy in monkeys: a quantitative histological appraisal.J Endod. 1985; 11: 269-274
Article info
Identification
Copyright
© 1987 Published by Elsevier Inc.
