Advertisement
Oral Medicine| Volume 93, ISSUE 5, P552-559, May 2002

The value of maximum jaw motion measurements for distinguishing between common temporomandibular disorder subgroups

  • Author Footnotes
    a Associate Professor, Department of Removable Prosthodontics, Kyushu Dental College, Kitakyushu, Japan.
    S. Masumi
    Footnotes
    a Associate Professor, Department of Removable Prosthodontics, Kyushu Dental College, Kitakyushu, Japan.
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    b Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Medicine, Orofacial Pain Clinic, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
    Y.J. Kim
    Footnotes
    b Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Medicine, Orofacial Pain Clinic, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    c Professor and Chair, Section of Oral Medicine and Orofacial Pain, UCLA School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, Calif
    G.T. Clark
    Footnotes
    c Professor and Chair, Section of Oral Medicine and Orofacial Pain, UCLA School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, Calif
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    a Associate Professor, Department of Removable Prosthodontics, Kyushu Dental College, Kitakyushu, Japan.
    b Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Medicine, Orofacial Pain Clinic, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
    c Professor and Chair, Section of Oral Medicine and Orofacial Pain, UCLA School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, Calif

      Abstract

      Objective. The purpose of this study was to determine if mandibular motion measurements could be used to distinguish between common temporomandibular disorder (TMD) subgroups that were established on the basis of only clinical signs and symptoms. Study Design. Patients were 41 consecutive TMD clinic patients (31 women and 10 men). These patients were divided into 6 typical TMD subgroups. The subgroups were patients with (1) arthromyalgia, (2) arthromyalgia with disk condyle incoordination, (3) disk condyle incoordination only, (4) osteoarthritis, (5) suspected disk displacement without reduction, or (6) other diagnoses. Results. There were no subjects in the other-diagnosis subgroup and only 1 subject with suspected disk displacement without reduction who was dropped without further consideration. The data for mean age showed that the osteoarthritis subgroup (n = 12) was statistically older (17 years) than the disk-condyle-incoordination-only subgroup (n = 11). The mean age of the other 2 groups, arthromyalgia (n = 11) and arthromyalgia with disk condyle incoordination (n = 6), was between the osteoarthritis and the disk-condyle-incoordination-only subgroups. For the 4 TMD subgroups whose data were analyzed, the mean differences between similar jaw opening measurements ranged from 6 to 8 mm with a standard deviation of approximately 8 to 10 mm. The mean left lateral motions were 0.5 to 1.3 mm larger than observed on the right. The widest mean jaw opening (56 mm) occurred in the disk-condyle-incoordination-only group. These differences were not found to be statistically significant. Conclusion. Analysis of opening, lateral and protrusive jaw motion data showed these measurements could not reliably differentiate between patients with osteoarthritis, arthromyalgia, arthromyalgia with disk condyle incoordination and disk condyle incoordination only. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002;93:552-9)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      References

        • Reider CE.
        Maximum mandibular opening in patients with and without a history of TMJ dysfunction.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1978; 39: 441-446
        • Solberg WK
        • Woo MW
        • Houston JB.
        Prevalence of mandibular dysfunction in young adults.
        J Am Dent Assoc. 1979; 98: 25-34
        • Gross A
        • Gale EN.
        A prevalence study of the clinical signs associated with mandibular dysfunction.
        J Am Dent Assoc. 1983; 107: 932-936
        • De Kanter RJ
        • Truin GJ
        • Burgersdijk RC
        • Van't Hof MA
        • Battistuzzi PG
        • Kalsbeek H
        • Kayser AF.
        Prevalence in the Dutch adult population and a meta-analysis of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorder.
        J Dent Res. 1993; 72: 1509-1518
        • Rauhala K
        • Oikarinen KS
        • Jarvelin MR
        • Raustia AM.
        Facial pain and temporomandibular disorders: an epidemiological study of the Northern Finland 1966 Birth Cohort.
        Cranio. 2000; 18: 40-46
        • Kamisaka M
        • Yatani H
        • Kuboki T
        • Matsuka Y
        • Minakuchi H.
        Four-year longitudinal course of TMD symptoms in an adult population and the estimation of risk factors in relation to symptoms.
        J Orofac Pain. 2000; 14: 224-232
        • Clark GT
        • Seligman DA
        • Solberg WK
        • Pullinger AG.
        Guidelines for the examination and diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders.
        J Craniomand Dis. 1989; 3: 7-14
        • McNeill C
        • Bell WE
        • Delaat A
        • Dworkin SF.
        Craniomandibular disorders: Guidelines for evaluation, diagnosis and management.
        The American Academy of Craniomandibular Disorders. : Quintessence, Chicago1990
        • Dworkin SF
        • LeResche L
        • DeRouen T
        • Von Korff M.
        Assessing clinical signs of temporomandibular disorders: reliability of clinical examiners.
        J Prosthet Dent. 1990; 63: 574-579
        • De Wijer A
        • Lobbezoo-Scholte AM
        • Steenks MH
        • Bosman F.
        Reliability of clinical findings in temporomandibular disorders.
        J Orofac Pain. 1995; 9: 181-191
        • Marguelles-Bonnet RE
        • Carpentier P
        • Yung JP
        • Defrennes D
        • Pharaboz C.
        Clinical diagnosis compared with findings of magnetic resonance imaging in 242 patients with internal derangement of the TMJ.
        J Orofac Pain. 1995; 9: 244-253
        • Muller-Leisse C
        • Augthun M
        • Bauer W
        • Roth A
        • Gunther R.
        Anterior disc displacement without reduction in the temporomandibular joint: MRI and associated clinical findings.
        J Magn Reson Imaging. 1996; 6: 769-774
        • Emshoff R
        • Rudisch A.
        Validity of clinical diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: clinical versus magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of temporomandibular joint internal derangement and osteoarthrosis.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol and Endod. 2001; 91: 50-55
        • Yatani H
        • Suzuki K
        • Kuboki T
        • Matsuka Y
        • Maekawa K
        • Yamashita A.
        The validity of clinical examination for diagnosing anterior disk displacement without reduction.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol and Endodon. 1998; 85: 654-660
        • Barclay P
        • Hollender LG
        • Maravilla KR
        • Truelove EL.
        Comparison of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis in patients with disk displacement in the temporomandibular joint.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol and Endod. 1999; 88: 37-43
        • Lobbezoo-Scholte AM
        • De Leeuw JR
        • Steenks MH
        • Bosman F
        • Buchner R
        • Olthoff LW.
        Diagnostic subgroups of cra-niomandibular disorders. Part I: Self-report data and clinical findings.
        J Orofac Pain. 1995; 9: 24-36
        • Lobbezoo-Scholte AM
        • Lobbezoo F
        • Steenks MH
        • De Leeuw JR
        • Bosman F.
        Diagnostic subgroups of craniomandibular disorders. Part II: Symptom profiles.
        J Orofac Pain. 1995; 9: 37-43
        • LeResche L
        • Fricton J
        • Mohl N
        • Sommers E
        • Truelove E.
        Axis I: Clinical TMD conditions.
        J Craniomand Dis. 1992; 6: 327-330
        • Von Korff M
        • Dworkin S
        • Fricton J
        • Ohrbach R.
        Axis II: Pain related disability and psychological status.
        J Craniomand Dis. 1992; 6: 330-334
        • Clark GT
        • Delcanho RE
        • Goulet JP.
        The utility and validity of current diagnostic procedures for defining temporomandibular disorder patients.
        Adv Dent Res. 1993; 7: 97-112
        • Widmer CG
        • Huggins KH
        • Fricton J.
        History questionaire specifications for TMD examinations/examination forms.
        J Craniomand Dis. 1992; 6: 335-345
        • Goulet JP
        • Clark GT
        • Flack VF.
        Reproducibility of examiner performance for muscle and joint palpation in the temporomandibular system following training and calibration.
        Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1993; 21: 72-77
        • Ohrbach R
        • Gale EN.
        Pressure pain thresholds in normal muscles: reliability, measurement effects, and topographic differences.
        Pain. 1989; 37: 257-263
        • Goulet JP
        • Clark GT
        • Flack VF
        • Liu C.
        The reproducibility of muscle and joint tenderness detection methods and maximum mandibular movement measurement for the temporomandibular system.
        J Orofac Pain. 1998; 12: 17-26