Abstract
Objectives. The factors that influence postoperative pain after root canal treatment are not
completely understood. The purpose of this prospective clinical study was to evaluate
postoperative pain after root canal therapy performed in 1 appointment versus 2 appointments.
Study Design. Seventy-two patients requiring root canal therapy on permanent molars were included
in this study. Patients were randomly assigned to either the 1-appointment or the
2-appointment group. Both vital and nonvital teeth were included. The standardized
protocol for all teeth involved local anesthesia, isolation and access, engine-driven
rotary nickel-titanium canal instrumentation to a minimum size #5 (.028 mm).04 taper
Profile with step-back flaring, and irrigation with 2.5% NaOCl. Teeth in group 1 (n
= 39) were obturated at the first appointment by using laterally condensed gutta-percha
and Roth 811 sealer. Teeth in group 2 (n = 33) were closed with a sterile dry cotton
pellet and Cavit restoration and were obturated at a second appointment 7 to 14 days
later. A modified Visual Analogue Scale was used to measure preoperative pain and
pain at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after the first appointment. Statistical analysis
was performed to compare groups at each interval by using an independent-samples t test with Bonferroni adjustment. Results. There was no statistically significant difference between groups at preoperative
intervals or at any of the 4 postoperative intervals (P <.01). Conclusions. There was no difference in postoperative pain between patients treated in 1 appointment
and patients treated in 2 appointments. The majority of patients in both groups reported
no pain or only minimal pain within 24 to 48 hours of treatment. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002;93:605-10)
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral RadiologyAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Endodontic interappointment flare-ups: a prospective study of incidence and related factors.J Endod. 1992; 18: 172-177
- Comparison of effect of intracanal use of ketorolac tromethamine and dexa-methasone with oral ibuprofen on post treatment endodontic pain.J Endod. 1999; 25: 381-384
- Incidence of postoperative pain after one-appointment endodontic treatment of asymptomatic pulpal necrosis in single-rooted teeth.J Endod. 1982; 8: 370-375
- Postobturation pain after single- and multiple-visit endodontic therapy.J Dent. 1998; 26: 227-232
- Effectiveness of various medications on postoperative pain following complete instrumentation.J Endod. 1994; 20: 345-354
- Pain: a poor parameter of evaluation in dentistry.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1981; 52: 299-303
- Single visit endodontics: a clinical study.J Endod. 1983; 9: 147-152
- Incidence of postoperative pain after single-and multiple-visit endodontic procedures.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1983; 55: 68-72
- Flare-up rate in pulpally necrotic molars in one-visit versus two-visit endodontic treatment.J Endod. 1998; 24: 614-616
- An experimental basis for revising the graphic rating scale for pain.Pain. 1984; 19: 153-161
- The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain.Pain. 1983; 17: 45-56
Article info
Publication history
Accepted:
November 4,
2001
Received in revised form:
September 20,
2001
Received:
July 16,
2001
Footnotes
*Reprint requests:Bradford R. Johnson, DDS Department of Endodontics (M/C 642) College of Dentistry University of Illinois at Chicago 801 S Paulina St Chicago, IL 60612 [email protected]
Identification
Copyright
© 2002 Mosby, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.