Advertisement

Three-Dimensional Leeds Orthodontic Root Resorption Target Scale (3D-LORTS): A new structured pictographic tool for reporting root resorption caused by impacted maxillary canines detected on CBCT images and its impact on orthodontic treatment planning

Published:October 09, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2021.10.002
      Objectives. The objective of this study was to determine whether use of a root resorption pictogram, the Three-Dimensional Leeds Orthodontic Root Resorption Target Scale (3D-LORTS), in addition to cone beam computed tomography reports was associated with a change in orthodontic extraction decisions in cases with impacted maxillary canines and associated root resorption of adjacent teeth and to assess orthodontists’ experiences using the pictogram.
      Study Design. Orthodontists completed a web-based survey in which they selected their preferred treatment plan for 6 cases. Each case was randomly presented twice, initially without and then subsequently with the pictogram. Statistical analysis was conducted to assess differences in extraction decisions with and without the pictogram and the participants’ experiences using the 3D-LORTS.
      Results. A total of 194 orthodontists completed the survey. Significant differences in treatment decisions were found for 3 individual cases (P < .05) and for the 6 cases overall (P < .05). The majority of participants had positive perceptions of the pictogram, particularly with respect to ease of use, effect on understanding of root resorption location and severity, and usefulness as a communication aid.
      Conclusions. Inclusion of the pictogram in cone beam computed tomography reports was associated with an overall change in orthodontists’ extraction decisions. The majority of orthodontists reported positive experiences using the 3D-LORTS.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      References

        • Davies J
        • Harwood A
        • Whaites E.
        Update on 2D and 3D digital imaging in orthodontics.
        Orthodontic Update. 2011; 4: 6-13
        • Mozzo P
        • Procacci C
        • Tacconi A
        • Martini PT
        • Andreis IAB.
        A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results.
        Eur Radiol. 1998; 8: 1558-1564
        • Arai Y
        • Tammisalo E
        • Iwai K
        • Hashimoto K
        • Shinoda K.
        Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use.
        Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999; 28: 245-248
        • Ahmad M
        • Jenny J
        • Downie M.
        Application of cone beam computed tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery.
        Aust Dent J. 2012; 57: 82-94
        • Barghan S
        • Tetradis S
        • Mallya SM.
        Application of cone beam computed tomography for assessment of the temporomandibular joints.
        Aust Dent J. 2012; 57: 109-118
        • Tyndall DA
        • Kohltfarber H.
        Application of cone beam volumetric tomography in endodontics.
        Aust Dent J. 2012; 57: 72-81
        • Abramovitch K
        • Rice DD.
        Basic principles of cone beam computed tomography.
        Dent Clin North Am. 2014; 58: 463-484
        • Merrett S
        • Drage NA
        • Durning P.
        Cone beam computed tomography: a useful tool in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.
        J Orthod. 2009; 36: 202-221
        • Preda L
        • La Fianza A
        • Dore R
        • Pallavicini D
        • Di Maggio G
        • Camapani R
        The use of spiral computed tomography in the localisation of impacted maxillary canines.
        Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1997; 26: 236-241
        • Jawad Z
        • Carmichael F
        • Houghton N
        • Bates C.
        A review of cone beam computed tomography for the diagnosis of root resorption associated with impacted canines, introducing an innovative root resorption scale. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2016; 122: 765-771
        • da Silva Campos MJ
        • Silva KS
        • Gravina MA
        • Fraga MR
        • Vitrald RWF.
        Apical root resorption: the dark side of the root.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013; 143: 492-498
      1. Faculty of General Dental Practice. Selection Criteria for Dental Radiography.
        Royal College of Surgeons of England, London2004
        • Silva MAG
        • Wolf U
        • Heinicke F
        • Bumann A
        • Visser H
        • Hirsch E.
        Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation.
        Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133 (640.e1-640.e5)
        • Horner K
        • Islam M
        • Flygare L
        • Tsiklakis K
        • Whaites E.
        Basic principles for use of dental cone beam computed tomography: consensus guidelines of the European Academy of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology.
        Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009; 38: 187-195
      2. Cone-Beam CT for Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology. Evidence-Based Guidelines.
        SEDENTEXCT Research ProjectEuropean Commission, Luxembourg2012
        • Christell H
        • Birch S
        • Bondemark L
        • Horner K
        • Lindh C
        • Consortium SEDENTEXCT
        The impact of cone beam CT on financial costs and orthodontists’ treatment decisions in the management of maxillary canines with eruption disturbance.
        Eur J Orthod. 2018; 40: 65-73
        • Rosenstiel SF
        • Ward DH
        • Rashid RG.
        Dentists’ preferences of anterior tooth proportiona web-based study.
        J Prosthodont. 2000; 9: 123-136
        • Rosenstiel SF
        • Land MF
        • Rashid RG.
        Dentists’ molar restoration choices and longevity: a web-based survey.
        J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 91: 363-367
        • Oh PY
        • Chadwick SM.
        Perceptions of orthodontic specialist training in the United Kingdom: a national survey of postgraduate orthodontic student opinion.
        J Orthod. 2016; 43: 202-217
        • Qadri S
        • Parkin NA
        • Benson PE.
        Space closing versus space opening for bilateral missing upper lateral incisorsaesthetic judgements of laypeople: a web-based survey.
        J Orthod. 2016; 43: 137-146
        • Yetter G
        • Capaccioli K.
        Differences in responses to web and paper surveys among school professionals.
        Behav Res Methods. 2010; 42: 266-272
        • Ker AJ
        • Chan R
        • Fields HW
        • Beck M
        • Rosenstiel S.
        Esthetics and smile characteristics from the layperson's perspective. a computer-based survey study.
        J Am Dent Assoc. 2008; 139: 1318-1327