Advertisement
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery| Volume 135, ISSUE 3, P324-332, March 2023

Buccal plate thickness as a predictor for endodontic microsurgery outcomes: A retrospective cohort study

      Objective

      The aim of the study was to determine the relationship between preoperative buccal plate thickness (BPT) and radiographic healing at the osteotomy site after endodontic microsurgery (EMS) with and without guided tissue regeneration (GTR) using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging.

      Study Design

      The retrospective sample of 143 individuals who had EMS with pre- and postoperative CBCT scans available were divided into 2 groups: group 1 (GTR) and group 2 (no GTR), which were further divided into teeth where BPT was >1.0 mm or ≤1.0 mm. Bone healing was assessed by subjective evaluation of bone formation at the resected root surface (I1), periapical bone formation (I2), cortical plate formation (I3), and a derived index (Author2-Author1 Indices) (I4), calculated by a composite score of I1 and I2.

      Results

      There was no significant impact on surgical healing with the use of GTR when BPT is >1.0 mm. The GTR had a significant impact on surgical healing when the BPT was ≤1.0 mm.

      Conclusions

      This study supported the use of CBCT to evaluate three-dimensional healing after EMS. The Author2-Author1 index was found to be a clinically relevant method for assessing healing. To improve healing rate, the EMS cases with a preoperative BPT of ≤1.0 mm may benefit from GTR.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      References

        • Setzer FC
        • Shah SB
        • Kohli MR
        • Karabucak B
        • Kim S.
        Outcome of endodontic surgery: a meta-analysis of the literature—part 1: comparison of traditional root-end surgery and endodontic microsurgery.
        J Endod. 2010; 36: 1757-1765
        • von Arx T
        • Janner SFM
        • Hänni S
        • Bornstein MM.
        Evaluation of new cone-beam computed tomographic criteria for radiographic healing evaluation after apical surgery: assessment of repeatability and reproducibility.
        J Endod. 2016; 42: 236-242
        • Orstavik D
        • Kerekes K
        • Eriksen HM.
        The periapical index: a scoring system for radiographic assessment of apical periodontitis.
        Dent Traumatol. 1986; 2: 20-34
        • Estrela C
        • Bueno MR
        • Leles CR
        • Azevedo B
        • Azevedo JR.
        Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic and periapical radiography for detection of apical periodontitis.
        J Endod. 2008; 34: 273-279
        • Chen I
        • Karabucak B
        • Wang C
        • et al.
        Healing after root-end microsurgery by using mineral trioxide aggregate and a new calcium silicate-based bioceramic material as root-end filling materials in dogs.
        J Endod. 2015; 41: 389-399
        • Schloss T
        • Sonntag D
        • Kohli MR
        • Setzer FC.
        A Comparison of 2- and 3Dimensional healing assessment after endodontic surgery using cone-beam computed tomographic volumes or periapical radiographs.
        J Endod. 2017; 43: 1072-1079
        • von Arx T
        • Janner SFM
        • Hänni S
        • Bornstein MM.
        Radiographic assessment of bone healing using cone-beam computed tomographic scans 1 and 5 years after apical surgery.
        J Endod. 2019; 45: 1307-1313
        • Perlea P
        • Nistor C
        • Suciu I.
        Post-treatment periapical periodontitis X-ray versus CBCT—a case report.
        J Med Life. 2016; 9: 84-87
        • von Arx T
        • Janner SFM
        • Hänni S
        • Bornstein MM.
        Agreement between 2D and 3D radiographic outcome assessment one year after periapical surgery.
        Int Endod J. 2016; 49: 915-925
        • Azim AA
        • Albanyan H
        • Azim KA
        • Piasecki L.
        The Buffalo study: outcome and associated predictors in endodontic microsurgery—a cohort study.
        Int Endod J. 2021; 54: 301-318
        • Ferrus J
        • Cecchinato D
        • Pjetursson EB
        • Lang NP
        • Sanz M
        • Lindhe J.
        Factors influencing ridge alterations following immediate implant placement into extraction sockets: factors influencing ridge alterations.
        Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010; 21: 22-29
        • Tsesis I
        • Rosen E
        • Tamse A
        • Taschieri S
        • Del Fabbro M.
        Effect of guided tissue regeneration on the outcome of surgical endodontic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        J Endod. 2011; 37: 1039-1045
        • Sánchez-Torres A
        • Sánchez-Garcés MÁ
        • Gay-Escoda C.
        Materials and prognostic factors of bone regeneration in periapical surgery: a systematic review.
        Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014; 19: e419-e425
        • Lui JN
        • Khin MM
        • Krishnaswamy G
        • Chen NN.
        Prognostic factors relating to the outcome of endodontic microsurgery.
        J Endod. 2014; 40: 1071-1076
        • Song M
        • Nam T
        • Shin SJ
        • Kim E
        Comparison of clinical outcomes of endodontic microsurgery: 1 year versus long-term follow-up.
        J Endod. 2014; 40: 490-494
        • Song M
        • Chung W
        • Lee SJ
        • Kim E.
        Long-term outcome of the cases classified as successes based on short-term follow-up in endodontic microsurgery.
        J Endod. 2012; 38: 1192-1196
        • Rud J
        • Andreasen JO
        • Möller Jensen JE
        Radiographic criteria for the assessment of healing after endodontic surgery.
        Int J Oral Surg. 1972; 1: 195-214
        • Andreasen JO
        • Rud J.
        Modes of healing histologically after endodontic surgery in 70 cases.
        Int J Oral Surg. 1972; 1: 148-160
        • Song M
        • Kim SG
        • Shin SJ
        • Kim HC
        • Kim E.
        The influence of bone tissue deficiency on the outcome of endodontic microsurgery: a prospective study.
        J Endod. 2013; 39: 1341-1345
        • Kim D
        • Ku H
        • Nam T
        • Yoon TC
        • Lee CY
        • Kim E.
        Influence of size and volume of periapical lesions on the outcome of endodontic microsurgery: 3Dimensional analysis using cone-beam computed tomography.
        J Endod. 2016; 42: 1196-1201
        • Kang S
        • Ha SW
        • Kim U
        • Kim S
        • Kim E.
        A one-year radiographic healing assessment after endodontic microsurgery using cone-beam computed tomographic scans.
        J Clin Med. 2020; 9: 3714
        • Molven O
        • Halse A
        • Grung B.
        Observer strategy and the radiographic classification of healing after endodontic surgery.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987; 16: 432-439
        • Farina R
        • Trombelli L.
        Wound healing of extraction sockets.
        Endod Top. 2011; 25: 16-43
        • Barnett CW
        • Glickman GN
        • Umorin M
        • Jalali P.
        Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of cone-beam computed tomography in identification of apical periodontitis.
        J Endod. 2018; 44: 938-940