Advertisement

Patient-reported outcome measures for individuals with temporomandibular joint disorders: a systematic review and evaluation

Published:August 11, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2022.08.002

      Objective

      We used consensus-based, systematic protocols to evaluate the reliability and validity of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for use in documenting treatment outcomes for temporomandibular disorders (TMDs).

      Study Design

      Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we conducted a focused search of 5 literature databases resulting in a yield of 445 articles that qualified for full-text review. Our review identified 124 PROMs, from which we selected 19 directly related to symptoms of TMD including temporomandibular joint (TMJ) function.

      Results

      We abstracted data on 9 Consensus-based Standards of the selection of health Measurements INstruments (COSMIN) measurement properties and analyzed these data according to COSMIN criteria. Only 3 PROMs provided evidence for at least half of the COSMIN properties: Eight-item Jaw Function Limitations Scale, Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)–TMD (OHIP-TMD), and TMJ Ankylosis Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. Only the OHIP-TMD provided evidence for properties essential to evaluating change over time: reliability, measurement error, and responsiveness.

      Conclusion

      We believe these results can alert clinical practitioners to gaps in our knowledge about the most widely used PROMs in TMD practice, and identify topics requiring further study for clinical researchers.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      References

        • Chantaracherd P
        • John MT
        • Hodges JS
        • Schiffman EL.
        Temporomandibular joint disorders' impact on pain, function, and disability.
        J Dent Res. 2015; 94: 79s-86s
        • Wright EF.
        Manual of Temporomandibular Disorders.
        Hooken (NJ). 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons Inc, 2014
        • List T
        • Axelsson S.
        Management of TMD: evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
        J Oral Rehabil. 2010; 37: 430-451
        • Al-Ani MZ
        • Davies SJ
        • Gray RJ
        • Sloan P
        • Glenny AM.
        Stabilisation splint therapy for temporomandibular pain dysfunction syndrome.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004; Cd002778
        • Koh H
        • Robinson PG.
        Occlusal adjustment for treating and preventing temporomandibular joint disorders.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003; Cd003812
        • Nandhini J
        • Ramasamy S
        • Ramya K
        • et al.
        Is nonsurgical management effective in temporomandibular joint disorders? - a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2018; 15: 231-241
      1. US Food and Drug Administration. Patient-Focused Drug Development: Methods to identify what is important to patients & select, develop or modify fit-for-purpose clinical outcomes assessments. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/news-events-human-drugs/patient-focused-drug-development-guidance-methods-identify-what-important-patients-and-select. Health and Human Services. 2018. Accessed August, 17, 2021

      2. Food and Drug Administration-National Institutes of Health Biomarker Working Group. BEST (Biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools) Resource. Silver Spring (MD), Bethesda (MD): Food and Drug Administration (US), National Institutes of Health (US); 2016.

      3. US Food and Drug Administration. Patient-reported outcomes measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: guidance for industry and FDA staff. December 2009. FDA Website. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/patient-reported-outcome-measures-use-medical-product-developmentsupport-labeling-claims. Accessed August 17, 2021

      4. US Food and Drug Administration. Qualification Process for Drug Development Tools: Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff. November 2020. FDA Website. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/qualification-process-drug-development-tools-guidance-industry-and-fda-staff. Accessed August 17, 2021

      5. US Food and Drug Administration. Qualification of Medical Device Development Tools: Guidance for industry, tool developers, and FDA staff. August 2017. FDA website. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/qualification-medical-device-development-tools. Accessed August 17, 2021

        • Page MJ
        • McKenzie JE
        • Bossuyt PM
        • et al.
        The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
        Int J Surg. 2021; 88105906
        • Prinsen CA
        • Vohra S
        • Rose MR
        • et al.
        Core outcome measures in effectiveness trials (COMET) initiative: protocol for an international Delphi study to achieve consensus on how to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a 'core outcome set'.
        Trials. 2014; 15: 247
        • Prinsen CA
        • Vohra S
        • Rose MR
        • et al.
        How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a "Core Outcome Set" - a practical guideline.
        Trials. 2016; 17: 449
        • Coltman T
        • Devinney TM
        • Midgley DF
        • Venaik S.
        Formative versus reflective measurement models: two applications of formative measurement.
        J Bus Res. 2008; 61: 1250-1262
        • Conijn AP
        • Jens S
        • Terwee CB
        • Breek JC
        • Koelemay MJ.
        Assessing the quality of available patient reported outcome measures for intermittent claudication: a systematic review using the COSMIN checklist.
        Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015; 49: 316-334
        • Von Piekartz H
        • Lüdtke K.
        Effect of treatment of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in patients with cervicogenic headache: a single-blind, randomized controlled study.
        Cranio. 2011; 29: 43-56
        • La Touche R
        • Pardo-Montero J
        • Gil-Martínez A
        • et al.
        Craniofacial pain and disability inventory (CF-PDI): development and psychometric validation of a new questionnaire.
        Pain Physician. 2014; 17: 95-108
        • Li XL
        • He SL
        • Wang JH.
        Validation of a web-based version of the craniofacial pain and disability inventory.
        J Oral Rehabil. 2020; 47: 802-808
        • Monticone M
        • Rocca B
        • Abelli P
        • et al.
        Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Italian version of the craniofacial pain and disability inventory in patients with chronic temporomandibular joint disorders.
        BMC Oral Health. 2019; 19: 244
        • Greghi SM
        • Dos Santos AA
        • Bataglion C
        • et al.
        Brazilian Portuguese version of the craniofacial pain and disability inventory: cross-cultural reliability, internal consistency, and construct and structural validity.
        J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2018; 32: 389-399
        • Ortiz-Comino L
        • Fernández-Lao C
        • Speksnijder CM
        • et al.
        Upper body motor function and swallowing impairments and its association in survivors of head and neck cancer: a cross-sectional study.
        PLoS One. 2020; 15e0234467
        • Belafsky PC
        • Mouadeb DA
        • Rees CJ
        • et al.
        Validity and reliability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10).
        Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008; 117: 919-924
        • Brister H
        • Turner JA
        • Aaron LA
        • Mancl L.
        Self-efficacy is associated with pain, functioning, and coping in patients with chronic temporomandibular disorder pain.
        J Orofac Pain. 2006; 20: 115-124
        • Aksakalli S
        • Temucin F
        • Pamukcu A
        • et al.
        Effectiveness of two different splints to treat temporomandibular disorders.
        J Orofac Orthop. 2015; 76: 318-327
        • Rodrigues-Bigaton D
        • de Castro EM
        • Pires PF.
        Factor and Rasch analysis of the Fonseca anamnestic index for the diagnosis of myogenous temporomandibular disorder.
        Braz J Phys Ther. 2017; 21: 120-126
        • Sánchez-Torrelo CM
        • Zagalaz-Anula N
        • Alonso-Royo R
        • et al.
        Transcultural adaptation and validation of the Fonseca Anamnestic Index in a Spanish population with temporomandibular disorders.
        J Clin Med. 2020; 9: 3230
        • Campos JA
        • Carrascosa AC
        • Bonafé FS
        • Maroco J.
        Severity oftemporomandibular disorders in women: validity and reliability of the Fonseca Anamnestic Index.
        Braz Oral Res. 2014; 28: 16-21
        • Zhang MJ
        • Yap AU
        • Lei J
        • Fu KY.
        Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Fonseca anamnestic index for temporomandibular disorders.
        J Oral Rehabil. 2020; 47: 313-318
        • Berni KC
        • Dibai-Filho AV
        • Rodrigues-Bigaton D.
        Accuracy of the Fonseca anamnestic index in the identification of myogenous temporomandibular disorder in female community cases.
        J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2015; 19: 404-409
        • Johnson J
        • Carlsson S
        • Johansson M
        • et al.
        Development and validation of the Gothenburg Trismus Questionnaire (GTQ).
        Oral Oncol. 2012; 48: 730-736
        • Johansson M
        • Karlsson T
        • Finizia C.
        Further validation of the Gothenburg Trismus Questionnaire (GTQ).
        PLoS One. 2020; 15e0243805
        • Brochado FT
        • Jesus LH
        • Carrard VC
        • et al.
        Comparative effectiveness of photobiomodulation and manual therapy alone or combined in TMD patients: a randomized clinical trial.
        Braz Oral Res. 2018; 32: e50
        • Lövgren A
        • Österlund C
        • Ilgunas A
        • Lampa E
        • Hellström F.
        A high prevalence of TMD is related to somatic awareness and pain intensity among healthy dentals.
        Acta Odontol Scand. 2018; 76: 387-393
        • Coskun Benlidayi I
        • Salimov F
        • Kurkcu M
        • Guzel R
        Kinesio taping for temporomandibular disorders: single-blind, randomized, controlled trial of effectiveness.
        J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2016; 29: 373-380
        • List T
        • John MT
        • Ohrbach R
        • et al.
        Influence of temple headache frequency on physical functioning and emotional functioning in subjects with temporomandibular disorder pain.
        J Orofac Pain. 2012; 26: 83-90
        • Dworkin S
        • Sherman J
        • Mancl L
        • Ohrbach R
        • LeResche L
        • Truelove E.
        Reliability, validity, and clinical utility of the research diagnostic criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Axis II Scales: depression, non-specific physical symptoms, and graded chronic pain.
        J Orofac Pain. 2002; 16: 207-220
        • Dworkin SF
        • LeResche L.
        Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique.
        J Craniomandib Disord. 1992; 6: 301-355
        • Olivo SA
        • Fuentes J
        • Major PW
        • et al.
        The association between neck disability and jaw disability.
        J Oral Rehabil. 2010; 37: 670-679
        • Zumbrunn Wojczyńska A
        • Steiger B
        • Leiggener CS
        • Ettlin DA
        • Gallo LM
        Quality of life, chronic pain, insomnia, and jaw malfunction in patients after alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement: a questionnaire-based pilot study.
        Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021; 50: 948-955
        • Armijo Olivo SL
        Relationship Between Cervical Musculoskeletal Impairments and Temporomandibular Disorders: Clinical and Electromyographic Variables.
        Ann Arbor (MI): ProQuest Information & Learning. 2010;
        • Nguyen MS
        • Reemann P
        • Loorits D
        • et al.
        Association of temporomandibular joint osseous changes with anxiety, depression, and limitation of mandibular function in elderly Vietnamese.
        East Asian Arch Psychiatry. 2019; 29: 20-25
        • Xu L
        • He Y
        • Fan S
        • et al.
        Validation of a Chinese version of the Jaw Functional Limitation Scale in relation to the diagnostic subgroup of temporomandibular disorders.
        J Oral Rehabil. 2020; 47: 1-8
        • Ohrbach R
        • Larsson P
        • List T.
        The jaw functional limitation scale: development, reliability, and validity of 8-item and 20-item versions.
        J Orofac Pain. 2008; 22: 219-230
        • Tahir M
        • Kadir K
        • Apipi M
        • et al.
        Translation and adaptation of the diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders into the Malay language: psychometric evaluation of contents.
        J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2020; 34: 323-330
        • Zhang Y
        • Chung S-C
        • Chung J-W.
        Evaluation of jaw functional limitation in TMD Patients using a Korean version of Jaw Functional Limitation Scale (JFLS).
        J Oral Med Pain. 2004; 29: 297-304
        • Ohrbach R
        • Granger C
        • List T
        • Dworkin S.
        Preliminary development and validation of the Jaw Functional Limitation Scale.
        Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2008; 36: 228-236
        • Gerstner GE
        • Clark GT
        • Goulet JP.
        Validity of a brief questionnaire in screening asymptomatic subjects from subjects with tension-type headaches or temporomandibular disorders.
        Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1994; 22: 235-242
        • Undt G
        • Murakami K
        • Clark GT
        • et al.
        Cross-cultural adaptation of the JPF-Questionnaire for German-speaking patients with functional temporomandibular joint disorders.
        J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2006; 34: 226-233
        • Pastore GP
        • Goulart DR
        • Pastore PR
        • Prati AJ
        • de Moraes M.
        Comparison of instruments used to select and classify patients with temporomandibular disorder.
        Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2018; 31: 16-22
        • Sugisaki M
        • Kino K
        • Yoshida N
        • et al.
        Development of a new questionnaire to assess pain-related limitations of daily functions in Japanese patients with temporomandibular disorders.
        Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2005; 33: 384-395
        • Silveira A
        • Gadotti IC
        • Armijo-Olivo S
        • Biasotto-Gonzalez DA
        • Magee D.
        Jaw dysfunction is associated with neck disability and muscle tenderness in subjects with and without chronic temporomandibular disorders.
        Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015512792
        • Aggarwal VR
        • Lunt M
        • Zakrzewska JM
        • Macfarlane GJ
        • Macfarlane TV.
        Development and validation of the Manchester orofacial pain disability scale.
        Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2005; 33: 141-149
        • Kallás MS
        • Crosato EM
        • Biazevic MGH
        • Mori M
        • Aggarwal VR.
        Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the manchester orofacial pain disability scale.
        J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2013; 3: e3
        • Stegenga B
        • de Bont LGM
        • de Leeuw R
        • Boering G.
        Assessment of mandibular function impairment associated with temporomandibular joint osteoarthrosis and internal derangement.
        J Orofac Pain. 1993; 7: 183-195
        • Xu L
        • Cai B
        • Fang Z.
        Translation and validation of a Chinese version of the Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire.
        J Oral Rehabil. 2016; 43: 608-614
        • Kropmans TJ
        • Dijkstra PU
        • van Veen A
        • Stegenga B
        • de Bont LG.
        The smallest detectable difference of mandibular function impairment in patients with a painfully restricted temporomandibular joint.
        J Dent Res. 1999; 78: 1445-1449
        • van der Meulen MJ
        • Lobbezoo F
        • Aartman IHA
        • Naeije M.
        Validity of the Oral Behaviours Checklist: correlations between OBC scores and intensity of facial pain.
        J Oral Rehabil. 2014; 41: 115-121
        • Barbosa C
        • Manso MC
        • Reis T
        • et al.
        Cultural equivalence, reliability and utility of the Portuguese version of the Oral Behaviours Checklist.
        J Oral Rehabil. 2018; 45: 924-931
        • Campos JA
        • Carrascosa AC
        • Maroco J.
        Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire.
        J Oral Rehabil. 2012; 39: 377-383
        • Markiewicz MR
        • Ohrbach R
        • McCall Jr., WD
        Oral behaviors checklist: reliability of performance in targeted waking-state behaviors.
        J Orofac Pain. 2006; 20: 306-316
        • Yule PL
        • Durham J
        • Playford H
        • et al.
        OHIP-TMDs: a patient-reported outcome measure for temporomandibular disorders.
        Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2015; 43: 461-470
        • Yap AU
        • Qiu LY
        • Natu VP
        • Wong MC.
        Functional, physical and psychosocial impact of temporomandibular disorders in adolescents and young adults.
        Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2020; 25: e188-e194
        • Polonowita AD
        • Thomson WM
        • Thorburn DN.
        Clinical efficacy of a simplified approach to managing chronic temporomandibular disorders: evidence from a 1-year case series.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2019; 128: 227-234
        • Mortimer-Jones S
        • Stomski N
        • Cope V
        • Maurice L
        • Théroux J.
        Association between temporomandibular symptoms, anxiety and quality of life among nursing students.
        Collegian. 2019; 26: 373-377
        • Natu VP
        • Yap AUJ
        • Su MH
        • Irfan Ali NM
        • Ansari A
        Temporomandibular disorder symptoms and their association with quality of life, emotional states and sleep quality in South-East Asian youths.
        J Oral Rehabil. 2018; 45: 756-763
        • Durham J
        • Steele JG
        • Wassell RW
        • et al.
        Creating a patient-based condition-specific outcome measure for temporomandibular disorders (TMDs): Oral Health Impact Profile for TMDs (OHIP-TMDs).
        J Oral Rehabil. 2011; 38: 871-883
        • He SL
        • Wang JH.
        Validation of the Chinese version of the oral health impact profile for TMDs (OHIP-TMDs-C).
        Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015; 20: e161-e166
        • Muzaffar A.
        Development and Validation of Malay Version of Fonseca Anamnestic Index (FAI) & Oral Health Impact Profile for Temporomandibular Disorder (OHIP-TMD)/Muzaffar Apipi.
        University of Malaya, Kuala Lampur (Malaysia)2018
        • HT Al-Ahmad
        • ZB Al-Bitar
        The effect of temporomandibular disorders on condition-specific quality of life in patients with dentofacial deformities.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014; 117: 293-301
        • Johnston K
        • Bird L
        • Bright P.
        Temporomandibular joint effusion and its relationship with perceived disability assessed using musculoskeletal ultrasound and a patient-reported disability index.
        Ultrasound. 2015; 23: 90-96
        • Steigerwald DP
        • Maher JH.
        The Steigerwald/Maher TMD disability questionnaire. Today's Chiropractic. 1997; : 86-91
        • Nambi G
        • Abdelbasset WK.
        Efficacy of Maitland joint mobilization technique on pain intensity, mouth opening, functional limitation, kinesiophobia, sleep quality and quality of life in temporomandibular joint dysfunction following bilateral cervicofacial burns.
        Burns. 2020; 46: 1880-1888
        • Sharma VK
        • Rattan V
        • Rai S
        • Sharma P.
        Development and validation of temporomandibular joint ankylosis quality of life questionnaire.
        J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2020; 48: 779-785