In health care, most of our teaching takes place at the bedside during outpatient
clinic hours, in the operating and in the wards, regardless of the specialty. This
bedside teaching is a daily practice and is augmented by formal lectures and conferences
in the classroom type of setting. Both are essential and should complement each other.
Teaching and patient care should be balanced and time restrains seem to be identified
as the main obstacle in clinical teaching, in addition of course to attitudes and
perceptions by both the learner and the teacher. After reading the article by Irby
and Wilkerson and reviewing the proposed models for rapid teaching I found it interesting
that in my clinical teaching I migrate towards a specific approach based on the level
of my learner and the case scenario involved.
1
In my typical clinic there will be residents participating in patient care from all
levels of training (I-IV) and we try to assign patients based on the resident level.
But of course things do not always work out that way and a junior person may end up
in a complex consultation case that he or she has never been involved before. It is
usually evident when a resident is a bit lost as they attempt to present the case
and make sense of what is going on, so I find myself following the “activated demonstrations”
model. On the other hand with my senior level residents, who are usually involved
in more complex cases that may present a diagnostic challenge, my approach seems to
follow the SNAPP(S) model.
1
I put S in parenthesis as I am not always explicit about “Selecting a case related
problem for self-directed learning”. Perhaps because I feel my leaners should be or
are doing this anyway…area for improvement on my end as a teacher. In general the
one-minute preceptor model that we practiced in class and is discussed in this article
is my approach to the otherwise “routine” cases we see in the clinic. I did not know
it was called the one-minute pr1eceptor model, but interestingly enough after my resident
presents the case I tend to ask “so what do you think is going on?” The rest of the
conversation usually unfolds in a similar fashion as the model describes, with some
variations, based on the learner and the type of case.To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral RadiologyAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Teaching rounds - Teaching when time is limited.British Medical Journal. 2008; 336: 384-387
- Getting Beyond "Good Job": How to Give Effective Feedback.Pediatrics. 2011; 127: 205-207
- Understanding trust as an essential element of trainee supervision and learning in the workplace.Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2014; 19: 435-456
- Giving and Receiving Effective Feedback A Review Article and How-To Guide.Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 2019; 143: 244-250
Article info
Publication history
Published online: March 02, 2023
Accepted:
February 22,
2023
Received:
February 20,
2023
Publication stage
In Press Journal Pre-ProofIdentification
Copyright
© 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.